Quality of Reinforcers


DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is presented on an "as is" basis, and does not claim to present definitive information, make recommendation or to represent any official body or organization. Users of this site agree that the owner of the site or authors of pages and articles are indemnified against legal liability


To view/save page as pdf


Back to RESEARCH JOURNALS AND ARTICLES

 

QUALITY OF REINFORCERS"

 

Dixon, M.R. and A Cummings, A. (2001) Self-control in children with autism: 

response allocation during delays to reinforcement.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,34,491-495.

 

Hoch,H., McComas, J.J., Johnson, L., Faranda, N., and Guenther, S.L. (2002).

[The effects of magnitude and quality of reinforcement on choice responding

during play activities.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 171-181.

 

Mace FC, Neef NA, Shade D, Mauro BC .(1994) [Limited matching on 

concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 585-596.

 

McGill, P. (1999). Establishing Operations: Implications for

the Assessment, Treatment and Prevention of Problem Behavior.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 393-418.

 

$ Michael, J. (1993) Establishing operations

The Behavior Analyst, 16, 19 1-206

 

Neef N.A., & Lutz, M.N. (2001)A brief computer-based assessment of reinforcer dimensions affecting choice.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 57-60.

 

Neef NA, Mace FC, Shade D.(1993). Impulsivity in students with serious

emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, 

and quality. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 37-52.

 

Neef NA, Shade D, Miller MS (1994). Assessing influential dimensions 

of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575-583.

 

Top


2/17/08

counter