PECS and visual supports

This version was saved 16 years, 8 months ago View current version Page history

Saved by PBworks
on March 25, 2008 at 4:41:46 am

views

DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is presented on an "as is" basis, and does not claim to present definitive information, make recommendation or to represent any official body or organization. Users of this site agree that the owner of the site or authors of pages and articles are indemnified against legal liability

To view/save page as pdf

PECS
Visual Supports

PECS

PECS Website

Pyramid Ecucational consultants website

Includes interview with Andrew Bondy and Lori Frost.

1.5. Is PECS compatible with Skinner's analysis of Verbal Behavior?

Yes!, PECS was developed with Skinner's analysis of the functional aspects of language incorperated into each Phase and transitions between the Phases. From Skinner's perspective, any modality (speech, sign, pictures, VOCAs, etc) are equally valid approaches to developing verbal behavior. For an in depth description of the relationship between PECS and Verbal Behavior, please read Chapter 15 in the PECS Training Manual: 2nd Edition.

Top

"What is PECS?

Picture Exchange Communication System

Developed by: Andrew S. Bondy, Ph.D. & Lori Frost, M.S., CCC/SLP

The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) was developed in 1985 as a unique augmentative/ alternative training package that teaches children and adults with autism and other communication deficits to initiate communication. First used at the Delaware Autistic Program, PECS has received worldwide recognition for focusing on the initiation component of communication. PECS does not require complex or expensive materials. It was created with educators, resident care providers and families in mind, and so it is readilyused in a variety of settings.

PECS begins with teaching a student to exchange a picture of a desired item with a “teacher”, who immediately honors the request. The training protocol is based on B.F. Skinner’s book, Verbal Behavior so that functional verbal operants are systematically taught using prompting and reinforcement strategies that will lead to independent communication Verbal prompts are not used, thus building immediate initiation and avoiding prompt dependency. The system goes on to teach discrimination of symbols and then how to put them all together in simple sentences. In the most advanced Phases, individuals are taught to comment and answer direct questions. Many preschoolers using PECS also begin developing speech...

PECS Phases (I-VI)and Shortcut Notes

Phase I Single exchange picture for item

Teaches students to initiate communication right from the start by exchanging a single picture for a highly desired item.

Phase II Seek out communicative partner

Teaches students to be persistent communicators- to actively seek out their pictures and to travel to someone to make a request.

Shorthand notes Phase II

Phase III Add discrimination

Teaches students to discriminate pictures and to select the picture that represents the item they want.

Shorthand notes Phase III

Phase IV Requesting using I want

Teaches students to use sentence structure to make a request in the form of “I want _____.”

Shorthand notes Phase IV

Phase V Respond to "What do you want?

Teaches students to respond to the question “What do you want?”

Shorthand notes Phase V

Phase VI Commenting and use of attributes in requests

Teaches students to comment about things in their environment both spontaneously and in response to a question.

Shorthand notes Phase VI

Expanding Vocabulary

Teaches students to use attributes such as colors, shapes and sizes within their requests."

Full Article from Pyramid Associates|FULL ARTICLE

Fitzgerald color system to systemize PECS

Top

Research Picture Exchange Communication Systems with Children with autism.

Charlop-Christy, M., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L..A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. J ournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 213-231.

ABSTRACT

The picture exchange communication system (PECS) is an augmentative communication

system frequently used with children with autism (Bondy & Frost, 1994; Siegel, 2000;

Yamall, 2000). Despite its common clinical use, no well-controlled empirical investiga-

tions have been conducted to test the effectiveness of PECS. Using a multiple baseline

design, the present study examined the acquisition of PECS with 3 children with autism.

In addition, the study examined the effects of PECS training on the emergence of speech

in play and academic settings. Ancillary measures of social-communicative behaviors and

problem behaviors were recorded. Results indicated that all 3 children met the learning

criterion for PECS and showed concomitant increases in verbal speech. Ancillary gains

were associated with increases in social-communicative behaviors and decreases in prob-

lem behaviors. The results are discussed in terms of the provision of empirical support

for PECS as well as the concomitant positive side effects of its use.

Ganz, J.B., & Simpson, R.L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the Picture Exchange Communication System in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 395-409.

ABSTRACT

Few studies on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems have addressed the potential for such systems to impact word utterances in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is an AAC system designed specifically to minimize difficulties with communication skills experienced by individuals with ASD. The current study examined the role of PECS in improving the number of words spoken, increasing the complexity and length of phrases, and decreasing the non-word vocalizations of three young children with ASD and developmental delays (DD) with related characteristics. Participants were taught Phases 1–4 of PECS (i.e., picture exchange, increased distance, picture discrimination, and sentence construction). The results indicated that PECS was mastered rapidly by the participants and word utterances increased in number of words and complexity of grammar.

Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 154-163.

ABSTRACT:

This study compared the effects of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) and sign language training on the acquisition of mands (requests for preferred items) of students with autism. The study also examined the differential effects of each modality on students' acquisition of vocal behavior. Participants were two elementary school students with autism enrolled in a suburban public school. Training sessions involved presentations of preferred items, prompting and prompt fading procedures. Probes were conducted to evaluate the generalization of learned mands to classroom teachers. For one participant, sign language training produced a higher percentage of independent mands. PECS training produced a higher percentage of independent mands for the other participant. For both participants, sign language training produced a higher percentage of vocalizations during training. Mands learned with the experimenter generalized to classroom teachers. The results of the study suggest that acquisition of picture exchange and sign language may vary as a function of individual student characteristics, specifically, motor imitation skills prior to intervention. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal procedures for teaching both modalities to students with communication difficulties.

Tincani, M. , Crozier, S., Alazett, S.(2006). The Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on manding and speech development for school-aged children with autism. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 177-184.

ABSTRACT:We examined the effects of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS; Frost & Bondy, 2002) on the manding (requesting) and speech development of school-aged children with autism. In study 1, two participants, Damian and Bob, were taught PECS within a delayed multiple baseline design. Both participants demonstrated increased levels of manding after implementation of PECS. Only Damian demonstrated any measurable speech during study 1. His speech development occurred primarily during phase IV of PECS. Because of the correlation between Phase IV and increased speech for Damian, study 2 was conducted to establish a functional relationship between phase IV procedures and speech development for an additional participant. Carl received phase IV training procedures in two conditions, administered in an ABAB design. In condition A, no reinforcement was provided for vocalization; in condition B, reinforcement was provided for vocalization after a delay of 3- to 5-s. The vocal reinforcement procedures in phase B differentially increased Carl's level of speech. Results are discussed in terms of research on augmentative and alternative communication and speech development for children with autism.

Top